You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Support storing cephfs omap in a different namespace in rados under the same filesystem metadata pool
What is the value to the end user? (why is it a priority?)
With this feature, even the metadata of the pvc/subvolumes will be stored under a different namespace, where security/isolation is the priority the user/customers can configure csi to use a different namespace.
How will we know we have a good solution? (acceptance criteria)
We can have a new field in the configmap where we have an entry for the subvolumegroup name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this reasonable to you or do you really want to make it configurable via configmap which would need many function calls as the constant is used in many places.
Describe the feature you'd like to have
Support storing cephfs omap in a different namespace in rados under the same filesystem metadata pool
What is the value to the end user? (why is it a priority?)
With this feature, even the metadata of the pvc/subvolumes will be stored under a different namespace, where security/isolation is the priority the user/customers can configure csi to use a different namespace.
How will we know we have a good solution? (acceptance criteria)
We can have a new field in the configmap where we have an entry for the subvolumegroup name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: