Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support storing cephfs omap in a different namespace in rados under same filesystem metadata pool #4599

Open
Madhu-1 opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #4652
Open
Assignees
Labels
component/cephfs Issues related to CephFS enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Madhu-1
Copy link
Collaborator

Madhu-1 commented May 6, 2024

Describe the feature you'd like to have

Support storing cephfs omap in a different namespace in rados under the same filesystem metadata pool

What is the value to the end user? (why is it a priority?)

With this feature, even the metadata of the pvc/subvolumes will be stored under a different namespace, where security/isolation is the priority the user/customers can configure csi to use a different namespace.

How will we know we have a good solution? (acceptance criteria)

We can have a new field in the configmap where we have an entry for the subvolumegroup name.

@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 added component/cephfs Issues related to CephFS enhancement New feature or request labels May 6, 2024
@iPraveenParihar iPraveenParihar self-assigned this May 15, 2024
@zerotens
Copy link

zerotens commented May 30, 2024

Hello together, funny story.
I wrote today a PR, but i didn't see the issue and that @iPraveenParihar was already working on it.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-csi/compare/devel...zerotens:cephfs-namespace?expand=1

Is this reasonable to you or do you really want to make it configurable via configmap which would need many function calls as the constant is used in many places.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/cephfs Issues related to CephFS enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
3 participants