New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consistent option naming for alignment #10110
Comments
@LeeLenaleee Hi. Let's discuss some specific cases:
What do you think about it? |
I don't have a hard opinion about this, I just wonder how this will evolve. Should these "alternative" options be kept indefinitely in the code? Or, should at some point the backward compatibility be broken so that everyone has to go and replace My wild guess is that this will never be a reason to break the compatibility so Chart.js will stay with these pair of alternative options forever. (And end users will have to deal with longer lists of options in the autocompletion.) |
I believe the reason we have Is there a list of what options still use left/right/top/bottom? Maybe some are in cases where is makes sense to keep those because they don't change orientation |
@etimberg @LeeLenaleee I'm started to dig into this task and I see that it needs much time to implement, but I don't see much profit in it. Also, I can say, that if the codebase will be rewritten completely in TypeScript, it will much easier to implement. So my suggestion is to wait until we rewrite the whole project into TypeScript. What do you think? |
That's fine by me |
Feature Proposal
Comming from #10106 (comment) make all alginment's
start
,center
andend
instead ofleft
,center
andright
.Will also make it easyer to work with since its more consistent instead of 2 kind of naming scheme's
Possible Implementation
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: