Are there IDE completion stubs available?

[sewbacca]

I'd like to do some scripting and hope to get some autocompletion for scripts in VSCode. I am using LuaLS. Are there any definition files available or maybe some formatted data, from which I can generate some definition files on my own?

[chrisant996]

Can you describe more about what you're looking for?

Are you asking for autocompletion in VSCode while editing Lua scripts in VSCode?

[sewbacca]

Exactly. As a workarround I scanned the environment and dumped the definitions into a normal Lua file which can be read by the language server, so I have at least some completion.
However what is missing are parameters and return values. The first could be extracted if these are native Lua functions, the latter can't be.
What I would need is something similar to these serialized love2d definitions or actual Lua files containing the definitions.
Since there is a documentation for the Lua reference, I could just parse the html files, which I think I'll do, if there is no other option, but it seems to me they are auto generated from something easier to parse.

[chrisant996]

Are you asking for autocompletion in VSCode while editing Lua scripts in VSCode?

Exactly.

I can't tell which of these you mean:

• VSCode should assume that all Lua scripts will be executed by Clink, and always add completions for Clink's extensions to Lua.
• VSCode should somehow predict whether a Lua script is going to be executed by Clink, and if so then add completions for Clink's extensions to Lua.

Anyway, it sounds like the only part you're actually asking about is how to find what Lua functions Clink adds to standard Lua.
The HTML documentation for Clink is parsed from the Clink source code.
See do_docs() in the docs/premake5.lua script.

[sewbacca]

Thanks, that is what I was looking for! I just wanted autocompletion, but there are ways to make the language server autodetect clink. I almost finished a definition file generator, but am now wondering, whether or not I should make a pull request or rather keep the generator in a custom repository using this repo as a submodule. I guess it boils down to whether or not you are interested in providing IDE autocompletion files. What do you think?

[chrisant996]

It sounds like a separate repo would be appropriate.