-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ipsec: Don't attempt per-node route deletion when unexistant #26093
Merged
pchaigno
merged 1 commit into
cilium:main
from
pchaigno:fix-spurious-ipsec-error-messages
Jun 13, 2023
Merged
ipsec: Don't attempt per-node route deletion when unexistant #26093
pchaigno
merged 1 commit into
cilium:main
from
pchaigno:fix-spurious-ipsec-error-messages
Jun 13, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Commit 3e59b68 ("ipsec: Per-node XFRM states & policies for EKS & AKS") changed the XFRM config to have one state and policy per remote node in IPAM modes ENI and Azure. The IPsec cleanup logic was therefore also updated to call deleteIPsec() whenever a remote node is deleted. However, we missed that the cleanup logic also tries to remove the per-node IP route. In case of IPAM modes ENI and Azure, the IP route however stays as before: we have a single route for all remote nodes. We therefore don't have anything to cleanup. Because of this unnecessary IP route cleanup attempt, an error message was printed for every remote node deletion: Unable to delete the IPsec route OUT from the host routing table This commit fixes it to avoid attempting this unnecessary cleanup. Fixes: 3e59b68 ("ipsec: Per-node XFRM states & policies for EKS & AKS") Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
pchaigno
added
release-note/bug
This PR fixes an issue in a previous release of Cilium.
area/encryption
Impacts encryption support such as IPSec, WireGuard, or kTLS.
needs-backport/1.11
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
labels
Jun 9, 2023
/test |
pchaigno
added
release-blocker/1.11
This issue will prevent the release of the next version of Cilium.
release-blocker/1.12
This issue will prevent the release of the next version of Cilium.
release-blocker/1.13
This issue will prevent the release of the next version of Cilium.
labels
Jun 13, 2023
I see two instances of #25964 and one of #26009 in the failed Conformance ginkgo test, I'm re-triggering the failed jobs (the workflow is not “required” anyway). |
qmonnet
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2023
jibi
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Jun 13, 2023
1 task
qmonnet
added
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
labels
Jun 13, 2023
1 task
8 tasks
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport pending to v1.11
in 1.11.18
Jun 13, 2023
qmonnet
added
backport-done/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Jun 14, 2023
qmonnet
added
backport-done/1.12
The backport for Cilium 1.12.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.11
The backport for Cilium 1.11.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.12
labels
Jun 14, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Backport pending to v1.11
to Backport done to v1.11
in 1.11.18
Jun 14, 2023
This was referenced Jun 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/encryption
Impacts encryption support such as IPSec, WireGuard, or kTLS.
backport-done/1.11
The backport for Cilium 1.11.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.12
The backport for Cilium 1.12.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is done.
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
release-blocker/1.11
This issue will prevent the release of the next version of Cilium.
release-blocker/1.12
This issue will prevent the release of the next version of Cilium.
release-blocker/1.13
This issue will prevent the release of the next version of Cilium.
release-note/bug
This PR fixes an issue in a previous release of Cilium.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Commit 3e59b68 ("ipsec: Per-node XFRM states & policies for EKS & AKS") changed the XFRM config to have one state and policy per remote node in IPAM modes ENI and Azure. The IPsec cleanup logic was therefore also updated to call deleteIPsec() whenever a remote node is deleted.
However, we missed that the cleanup logic also tries to remove the per-node IP route. In case of IPAM modes ENI and Azure, the IP route however stays as before: we have a single route for all remote nodes. We therefore don't have anything to cleanup.
Because of this unnecessary IP route cleanup attempt, an error message was printed for every remote node deletion:
This commit fixes it to avoid attempting this unnecessary cleanup.
Fixes: #24030.