-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ingress: fix panic on ingress rule without HTTPIngressRule #27818
Merged
aditighag
merged 1 commit into
cilium:main
from
mhofstetter:pr/mhofstetter/ingress-http-rules-panic
Aug 30, 2023
Merged
ingress: fix panic on ingress rule without HTTPIngressRule #27818
aditighag
merged 1 commit into
cilium:main
from
mhofstetter:pr/mhofstetter/ingress-http-rules-panic
Aug 30, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mhofstetter
added
kind/bug
This is a bug in the Cilium logic.
release-note/bug
This PR fixes an issue in a previous release of Cilium.
area/servicemesh
GH issues or PRs regarding servicemesh
feature/k8s-ingress
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
labels
Aug 30, 2023
mhofstetter
force-pushed
the
pr/mhofstetter/ingress-http-rules-panic
branch
from
August 30, 2023 09:16
f800ff7
to
ba5a9ea
Compare
mhofstetter
commented
Aug 30, 2023
Currently, defining an `Ingress` without an `HTTPIngressRule` (e.g. only Host set) results in a panic in the Cilium Operator. Therefore, this commit changes the ingress ingestion to process the HTTP paths only if the HTTPIngressRule is set on the rule. Signed-off-by: Marco Hofstetter <marco.hofstetter@isovalent.com>
mhofstetter
force-pushed
the
pr/mhofstetter/ingress-http-rules-panic
branch
from
August 30, 2023 12:15
ba5a9ea
to
a8e1bf2
Compare
meyskens
approved these changes
Aug 30, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for me
/test |
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Aug 30, 2023
jibi
added
backport-pending/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
labels
Sep 4, 2023
jibi
added
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.13
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.13 branch
labels
Sep 4, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport pending to v1.14
in 1.14.2
Sep 4, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport pending to v1.14
in 1.14.2
Sep 4, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport pending to v1.13
in 1.13.7
Sep 4, 2023
jibi
added
backport-done/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Sep 7, 2023
michi-covalent
moved this from Backport pending to v1.14
to Backport done to v1.14
in 1.14.2
Sep 9, 2023
michi-covalent
added
backport-done/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Sep 9, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Backport pending to v1.13
to Backport done to v1.13
in 1.13.7
Sep 9, 2023
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Backport pending to v1.13
to Backport done to v1.13
in 1.13.7
Sep 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/servicemesh
GH issues or PRs regarding servicemesh
backport-done/1.13
The backport for Cilium 1.13.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is done.
feature/k8s-ingress
kind/bug
This is a bug in the Cilium logic.
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
release-note/bug
This PR fixes an issue in a previous release of Cilium.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, defining an
Ingress
without anHTTPIngressRule
(e.g. only Host set) results in a panic in the Cilium Operator.Therefore, this commit changes the ingress ingestion to process the HTTP paths only if the HTTPIngressRule is set on the rule.