New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
srv6: Fix packet drop with GSO type mismatch #30732
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When the Pod generates a TCP stream larger than MSS, it may be sent as a GSO large packet. We observed in such a case, SRv6-encapsulated packet is dropped. The root cause was a misuse of ctx_adjust_hroom. We call it ctx_adjust_hroom(ctx, growth, BPF_ADJ_ROOM_MAC, 0), but this way, the helper is not aware of what kind of encapsulation we want to perform, so it doesn't adjust skb->inner_protocol (should be ETH_P_IP) and skb_shinfo->gso_type (should be SKB_GSO_IPXIP6 | SKB_GSO_TCPV4) appropriately. As a result, the packet will be dropped in ip4ip6_gso_segment due to the flag mismatch. Use BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_ENCAP_L3_IPV6 flag which is introduced to solve this problem. Signed-off-by: Yutaro Hayakawa <yutaro.hayakawa@isovalent.com>
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label
The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
label
Feb 13, 2024
YutaroHayakawa
added
release-note/bug
This PR fixes an issue in a previous release of Cilium.
release-note/misc
This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact.
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
needs-backport/1.15
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.15 branch
labels
Feb 13, 2024
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
removed
the
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label
The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
label
Feb 13, 2024
YutaroHayakawa
added
the
backport/author
The backport will be carried out by the author of the PR.
label
Feb 13, 2024
/test |
nickolaev
reviewed
Feb 14, 2024
aspsk
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2024
YutaroHayakawa
removed
the
release-note/misc
This PR makes changes that have no direct user impact.
label
Feb 15, 2024
ldelossa
approved these changes
Feb 15, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
added
the
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
label
Feb 15, 2024
YutaroHayakawa
removed
the
backport/author
The backport will be carried out by the author of the PR.
label
Feb 15, 2024
sayboras
added
backport-pending/1.15
The backport for Cilium 1.15.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.15
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.15 branch
labels
Feb 16, 2024
sayboras
added
backport-pending/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is in progress.
and removed
needs-backport/1.14
This PR / issue needs backporting to the v1.14 branch
labels
Feb 16, 2024
maintainer-s-little-helper
bot
moved this from Needs backport from main
to Backport pending to v1.14
in 1.14.7
Feb 16, 2024
github-actions
bot
added
backport-done/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Feb 16, 2024
github-actions
bot
added
backport-done/1.15
The backport for Cilium 1.15.x for this PR is done.
and removed
backport-pending/1.15
The backport for Cilium 1.15.x for this PR is in progress.
labels
Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-done/1.14
The backport for Cilium 1.14.x for this PR is done.
backport-done/1.15
The backport for Cilium 1.15.x for this PR is done.
ready-to-merge
This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge.
release-note/bug
This PR fixes an issue in a previous release of Cilium.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the Pod generates a TCP stream larger than MSS, it may be sent as a GSO large packet. We observed in such a case, SRv6-encapsulated packet is dropped.
The root cause was a misuse of
ctx_adjust_hroom
. We call itctx_adjust_hroom(ctx, growth, BPF_ADJ_ROOM_MAC, 0)
, but this way, the helper is not aware of what kind of encapsulation we want to perform, so it doesn't adjustskb->inner_protocol
(should beETH_P_IP
) andskb_shinfo->gso_type
(should beSKB_GSO_IPXIP6 | SKB_GSO_TCPV4
) appropriately. As a result, the packet will be dropped inip4ip6_gso_segment
due to the flag mismatch.Use
BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_ENCAP_L3_IPV6
flag which is introduced to solve this problem.