Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support clearAll() and getAll() #36

Open
libern opened this issue Mar 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Support clearAll() and getAll() #36

libern opened this issue Mar 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@cioccarellia
Labels
feature

Comments

@libern
Copy link

libern commented Mar 30, 2021

Hope can, as there could has encryption if manual get all.

Support clearAll() and getAll()
@cioccarellia cioccarellia self-assigned this Mar 30, 2021
@cioccarellia
Copy link
Owner

Adding a getAll method isn't as trivial as it may seem, since it requires a proxy which performs the inverse engine function (decrypts) for each record in the file, which may result in a performance hit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cioccarellia cioccarellia

Labels
feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@libern @cioccarellia