Skip to content

&Path with values_t #2013

Answered by CreepySkeleton
pickfire asked this question in Q&A
Jul 14, 2020 · 1 comments · 2 replies
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

No. It uses FromStr, which implies a reallocation, and your rationale was to avoid an extra allocation.

values_t will be replaced with ArgMatches::values_of_t by the way.

Replies: 1 comment 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@pickfire
Comment options

@CreepySkeleton
Comment options

Answer selected by pickfire
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants