Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reintroduce coalton-codegen-types or equivalent #1017

Open
stylewarning opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

reintroduce coalton-codegen-types or equivalent #1017

stylewarning opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@stylewarning
Copy link
Member

It got lost. I would either want the operator back, or perhaps just a global variable option.

@stylewarning stylewarning added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 12, 2023
@macrologist
Copy link
Collaborator

macrologist commented Oct 16, 2023

With what inputs are you looking for what outputs? I.e. what does the information you're keen to see look like? and when or where are you keen to see it?

@stylewarning
Copy link
Member Author

coalton-codegen-types is identical to coalton-codegen except the special variable that controls whether Lisp type declarations are emitted is set to T.

The lisp type decls are usually way too noisy, hence off by default.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants