Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RETENTION_MS config mandatory? #10203

Open
Propag78 opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

RETENTION_MS config mandatory? #10203

Propag78 opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Propag78
Copy link

Regarding this PR: #9223

Is there a reason why the RETENTION_MS config was made mandatory for existing topics? What difference does it make to ksqlDB if the retention is changed on the topic? I can understand partitions count might affect queries, but what about RETENTION_MS?

Also, for compacted topics, it still requires to set a RETENTION_MS even though it won't be used in reality.

Can't this parameter be optionnal?

Thanks!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant