Decide what to do about test 933161-4

[theseion]

As described by @M4tteoP in #3273 (comment), checking for dl might not be worth the trouble. We still have a commented test though (933161-4) and we should decide whether we want to implement the check or drop the test.

[dune73]

Is this playing into the "random base64 strings leading to FP" discussion? If yes, then probably not worth the trouble.

Do we understand the "web content" mentioned by @M4tteoP by now?

[theseion]

933161 looks for a function name followed by a comment. I would say that looks specific enough. It's not fool proof of course, but I don't think that base64 is an especially big issue in this case.