Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 14, 2024. It is now read-only.

Update question issue template #3291

Closed

Conversation

Ein-Tim
Copy link
Contributor

@Ein-Tim Ein-Tim commented Dec 12, 2022

This PR updates the issue template 02 (questions). It reflects the fact that the discussions feature is now used for questions.


Closes #3286


Internal Tracking ID: EXPOSUREAPP-14420

This commit updates the issue template 02 (questions). It reflects the fact that the discussions feature is now used for questions.
@Ein-Tim Ein-Tim requested a review from a team December 12, 2022 16:34
@cwa-bot cwa-bot bot added this to ToDo in [CM] cwa-website Dec 12, 2022
@Ein-Tim Ein-Tim changed the title Update issue template 02 Update question issue template Dec 12, 2022
Copy link
Member

@larswmh larswmh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one small suggestion, but the rest looks good. Thanks for submitting this PR!

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/02_questions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cwa-bot cwa-bot bot moved this from ToDo to Mirrored to Jira in [CM] cwa-website Dec 13, 2022
Co-authored-by: Lars <wittmershaus.lars@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@larswmh larswmh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this PR @Ein-Tim. We appreciate your effort but will leave this open for now as we're awaiting a final decision whether discussions will be kept enabled or not. As mentioned in #3282 (comment), we're treating it like an experiment for now and there could possibly be a change of plans. This is why we're careful with implementing changes that could be outdated very soon.

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Contributor

@larswmh

It doesn't seem like a big deal to keep Discussions enabled in this repository. Why would you want to disable them again? What would be the advantage? There are only a few people active here anyway.

@larswmh
Copy link
Member

larswmh commented Dec 15, 2022

@MikeMcC399

It doesn't seem like a big deal to keep Discussions enabled in this repository. Why would you want to disable them again? What would be the advantage? There are only a few people active here anyway.

I can understand your position but this is unfortunately not up to us to decide on. There have also been various arguments against it, for example that it would be another input channel that would need monitoring. We certainly did not think that this would have such an impact. GitHub has more to offer than just issues, and we think it could be very helpful to make use of it. We might end up with a compromise that satisfies all parties involved, but for now, we will have to wait.

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Contributor

I suggest to either merge this PR or close it. If it is decided to kill Discussions in this repository (which is a decision I wouldn't understand) then the PR can be reverted.

@Ein-Tim
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ein-Tim commented Feb 2, 2023

@dsarkar & @brianebeling

Any update you available here?

@brianebeling
Copy link
Member

Hey Tim, thanks for the PR. See the original issue for an update. I will close this PR now.

@Ein-Tim Ein-Tim deleted the fix/issue-template-discussions branch February 2, 2023 18:11
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
[CM] cwa-website
Mirrored to Jira
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update ISSUE_TEMPLATE to include discussions
4 participants