Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non-critical corrections - March 2023 Edition #677

Closed
jplatte opened this issue Mar 10, 2023 · 6 comments · Fixed by #704
Closed

Non-critical corrections - March 2023 Edition #677

jplatte opened this issue Mar 10, 2023 · 6 comments · Fixed by #704
Labels
enhancement Improve the expected

Comments

@jplatte
Copy link
Contributor

jplatte commented Mar 10, 2023

Please list any corrections you noticed typos doesn't fix and we'll roll these up into a single PR, making it lighterweight for adding new corrections.

@jplatte
Copy link
Contributor Author

jplatte commented Mar 10, 2023

  • referenecs -> references (plus the same without the s at the end)

@epage epage changed the title More typo dict entries March 2023 Non-critical corrections - March 2023 Edition Mar 10, 2023
@epage epage added the enhancement Improve the expected label Mar 10, 2023
@epage epage pinned this issue Mar 10, 2023
@epage
Copy link
Collaborator

epage commented Mar 10, 2023

Meta: We can try for a per-month issue for this for now. My original thought had been to use a Discussion with the current "correct answer" being the current month. This would provide a stable link for places like the README to use. The downside is its too easy for people to reply in the wrong thread / create a new thread and Github doesn't have the thread-editing tools of Zulip afaik

@epage
Copy link
Collaborator

epage commented Mar 10, 2023

  • configurating -> configuring
  • technicial -> technical
  • signficiantly -> significantly
  • substitues -> substitutes

Source: rust-lang/cargo#11794 (found after rust-lang/cargo11561)

@jplatte
Copy link
Contributor Author

jplatte commented Mar 10, 2023

Meta: I think the nice things about an issue are

  • you can pin it (though maybe this is a thing for discussions too)
  • people are more used to issues and go there first

But I think that's it really, mostly I did it this way because that's what came to mind for me. I'll be happy to suggest new corrections elsewhere if you decide to try sth. else at any point.

@adamchainz
Copy link

adamchainz commented Mar 15, 2023

encryptation -> encryption
decryptation -> decryption

@cmdcolin
Copy link

deature->feature

epage added a commit to epage/typos that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2023
@epage epage unpinned this issue Apr 3, 2023
@epage epage closed this as completed in #704 Apr 3, 2023
phip1611 pushed a commit to phip1611/typos that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improve the expected
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants