Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

missing a11y metadata not necessarily required #117

Open
mattgarrish opened this issue May 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

missing a11y metadata not necessarily required #117

mattgarrish opened this issue May 14, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@mattgarrish
Copy link

The list of missing accessibility metadata provided after the metadata table doesn't provide any indication of whether the metadata is actually required or not.

I could see people thinking that because certifierReport is listed as missing, for example, that means it has to be included, when it's just an optional field.

It might be useful to add whether the missing properties are required, recommended or optional, perhaps in parentheses after the name.

@danielweck
Copy link
Member

This is not specific to Ace App, I think the HTML report also needs to better present this information. In Ace App there is an indication of “severity” which is directly correlated with recommended / required, but I agree that this is unclear and should be improved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants