You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some resource status like KMP and certificate store may contain what might be considered sensitive information such as keys/certificate metadata. Ratify should first determine what RBAC is needed for status and whether default RBAC needs to be elevated to view status for certain resources. Ratify should also validate in namespace multitenancy scenarios.
Anything else you would like to add?
No response
Are you willing to submit PRs to contribute to this feature?
Yes, I am willing to implement it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What would you like to be added?
Some resource status like KMP and certificate store may contain what might be considered sensitive information such as keys/certificate metadata. Ratify should first determine what RBAC is needed for status and whether default RBAC needs to be elevated to view status for certain resources. Ratify should also validate in namespace multitenancy scenarios.
Anything else you would like to add?
No response
Are you willing to submit PRs to contribute to this feature?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: