False negative for enum constants in UndocumentedPublic* rule group

[TWiStErRob]

Steps to Reproduce

public enum class PublicEnum {
	Foo,
	Bar,
}

Configuration:

detekt.allRules = true
// Does not contain relevant lines, just a few rules deactivated or fine tuned.
detekt.config.from(rootProject.file("config/detekt/detekt.yml"))
dependencies { detektPlugins(libs.detekt.rules.libraries) }

Observed Behavior

src\main\kotlin\com\example\PublicEnum.kt:21:15: PublicEnum is missing required documentation. [UndocumentedPublicClass]

Expected Behavior

Findings for each of the undocumented enum constants. They're public API as well, accessible as PublicEnum.Foo.
If

public companion object {
    public val Foo: PublicClass = ...
}

needs to be documented (The property Foo is missing documentation. [UndocumentedPublicProperty]), so does these enum constants Foo and Bar as they're essentially "just syntactic a shorthand" for the same.

Context

I'm relying on detekt to ensure that all my public API surface is documented.

This repro might be a trivial case, but imagine an enum with 10-12 values, and no documentation.

• Related: False negative for companion object in UndocumentedPublicClass #7217

Your Environment

• Version of detekt used: 1.23.5
• Version of Gradle used (if applicable): 8.7
• Gradle scan link (add --scan option when running the gradle task): N/A
• Operating System and version: Windows 10 / GitHub Actions Ubuntu 22.04
• Link to your project (if it's a public repository): N/A

[atulgpt]

Should we make this configurable? Given documenting enum can be cumbersome

[TWiStErRob]

Documentation alone is cumbersome :) if someone enables this rule, they probably want it?