refactor: Remove fromInteraction in internal channel creation
#9335
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
@Jiralite is attempting to deploy a commit to the discordjs Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
github-actions
bot
requested review from
iCrawl,
kyranet,
SpaceEEC and
vladfrangu
kyranet
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2023
|
⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:
Lighthouse ran on https://discord-js-git-fork-jiralite-refactor-from-int-9209a8-discordjs.vercel.app/ |
iCrawl
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2023
jaw0r3k
added a commit
to jaw0r3k/discord.js
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2023
…djs#9335) Co-authored-by: Jiralite <33201955+Jiralite@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:
This existence of this parsing became redundant due to discord/discord-api-docs#3486 (comment), and as such, the remnant code will be removed.
Status and versioning classification: