Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dogecoin.com POOL #281

Open
Bestmeer opened this issue Jan 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Dogecoin.com POOL #281

Bestmeer opened this issue Jan 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Bestmeer
Copy link

I think Dogecoin.com should have its own mining POOL, that is completely decentralized in term that shibes all around the world will get the hardwares and the foundation can only run the software/pool

There should be small amount of fees taken for dogecoin devs, but the fees should be less than what other pools charge, so it can be attractive for miners

the payout for miners should be in $Doge only, so the $Ltc got mint will be directly sold and bought equivalent in $Doge and the miners get the payout in $Doge (same as litecoin.org)

Maybe then a host can be set in locations around the world to keep the pools more even decentralized and reduce the rejection rate

I this this will help Doge & Shibes in many ways

Such as Dogecoin will have its own Pool, the Pools distribution will be more decentralized, giving power back to the people, miners will get better payouts, the buy pressure from swapping ltc to Doge

Below is current Pool Distribution as per https://explorer.btc.com/ltc/insights-pools

C62C1DB7-4969-4B3D-9293-405FE1B7E73E

regards,

@qlpqlp
Copy link
Contributor

qlpqlp commented Jan 27, 2023

Much thanks. I wil try to see if it will be added somehow 😊♥️

@qlpqlp qlpqlp added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 14, 2023
@qlpqlp qlpqlp self-assigned this Mar 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants