Inconsistent detection of merge conflict, depending on direction of merge.

[nicktobey]

Potentially related to #7762

Steps to reproduce:

Add the following test to SchemaChangeTestsBasicCases in dolt_queries_schema_merge.go

	{
		Name: "ambiguous choice of ancestor column",
		AncSetUpScript: []string{
			"CREATE table t (pk int primary key, col1 int, col2 int);",
			"INSERT into t values (1, 10, 100), (2, 20, 200);",
		},
		RightSetUpScript: []string{
			"alter table t drop column col1;",
			"insert into t values (3, 30), (4, 40);",
		},
		LeftSetUpScript: []string{
			"alter table t drop column col2;",
			"alter table t rename column col1 to col2;",
			"insert into t values (5, 50), (6, 60);",
		},
		Assertions: []queries.ScriptTestAssertion{
			{
				Query:          "call dolt_merge('right');",
				ExpectedErrStr: "Merge conflict detected, @autocommit transaction rolled back. @autocommit must be disabled so that merge conflicts can be resolved using the dolt_conflicts and dolt_schema_conflicts tables before manually committing the transaction. Alternatively, to commit transactions with merge conflicts, set @@dolt_allow_commit_conflicts = 1",
			},
		},
	},

In this test, both branches have a col2 column, but these columns correspond to different columns in the ancestor schema. (In the implementation, we track this by giving each column a tag.) It's ambiguous which column in the ancestor should be used for the merge.

I don't know if we explicitly handle this case, and it's not obvious what the correct behavior should be. I think there's two reasonable arguments here:

• Since the column is named "col2" in both branches, the merge should use the column "col2" in the ancestor.
• This is ambiguous and should result in a merge conflict.

Regardless of the "correct" behavior, we're currently bugged. Dolt will do one or the other of these, depending on the merge direction.