You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why not include the stack pointer at the top of each stack so you can do this with a single num_stacks * (stack_size + 1) array?
Also, it is not clear why abs_index is part of the interface (as that is not part of the stack interface). Its purpose should be made clear in the challenge notebook.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Why not include the stack pointer at the top of each stack so you can do this with a single num_stacks * (stack_size + 1) array?
Also, it is not clear why abs_index is part of the interface (as that is not part of the stack interface). Its purpose should be made clear in the challenge notebook.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: