Migrate to Azure.Data.Tables SDK for Azure Table Storage (#7300) #7363
+1,576
−1,296
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
shmurchi
commented
Oct 29, 2021
* Migrate to Azure.Data.Tables SDK for Azure Table Storage * PR feedback * Reduce use of Tuple and other minor inefficiencies * Add helper methods for setting Azure Storage credentials * Table & Blob storage config updates * Fix test usages of table & blob storage config
starcraft66
added a commit
to starcraft66/orleans
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2021
…net#7300) (dotnet#7363)" This reverts commit 12a9c88.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backporting #7300
Migrate to Azure.Data.Tables SDK for Azure Table Storage
PR feedback
Reduce use of Tuple and other minor inefficiencies
Add helper methods for setting Azure Storage credentials
Table & Blob storage config updates
Fix test usages of table & blob storage config
EDIT by @ReubenBond: Also including #7383
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow