Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of mock-require is breaking the build 🚨 #340

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Jan 16, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

An in-range update of mock-require is breaking the build 🚨 #340

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Jan 16, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor

greenkeeper bot commented Jan 16, 2019

The devDependency mock-require was updated from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3.

🚨 View failing branch.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

mock-require is a devDependency of this project. It might not break your production code or affect downstream projects, but probably breaks your build or test tools, which may prevent deploying or publishing.

Status Details
  • continuous-integration/appveyor/branch: Waiting for AppVeyor build to complete (Details).
  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push: The Travis CI build failed (Details).

Commits

The new version differs by 3 commits.

  • 676fe01 3.0.3
  • 7b777f6 Merge pull request #39 from patrickdawson/master
  • 829122d Using path.sep and cross-env to be compatible with windows systems.

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jan 16, 2019

After pinning to 3.0.2 your tests are still failing. The reported issue might not affect your project. These imprecisions are caused by inconsistent test results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants