Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

owl:versionIRI for .owl files #870

Open
vtoure opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

owl:versionIRI for .owl files #870

vtoure opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
access | publication | release release process, CD, publication, serialisation, etc. enhancement New feature or request, other than "concept/term request" more info needed Please provide more information
Milestone

Comments

@vtoure
Copy link

vtoure commented Sep 1, 2023

Hi,

Currently EDAM has in the .owl file provided the version included as a doap:Version.

Are you considering (and) would it be possible for upcoming releases of the RDF versions of EDAM to provide an owl:versionIRI?

This is usually a common predicate (and header information in Protege) for indicating the version of an ontology. Also recommended (requested even) by the OBO Foundry for example.

In our case, this would facilitate the integration of EDAM into our project.

Thanks!

@matuskalas matuskalas self-assigned this Sep 1, 2023
@matuskalas matuskalas added enhancement New feature or request, other than "concept/term request" access | publication | release release process, CD, publication, serialisation, etc. more info needed Please provide more information labels Sep 1, 2023
@matuskalas matuskalas added this to the 1.26 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@matuskalas matuskalas added this to To do in release 1.26 via automation Sep 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
access | publication | release release process, CD, publication, serialisation, etc. enhancement New feature or request, other than "concept/term request" more info needed Please provide more information
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants