We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the sync/pool package is very verbose at the moment and operating it requires a lot of boilerplate code for task specific pools.
sync/pool
It'd be best if we had some abstractions built on top which are purpose-specific rather than catering for all possible cases of a pool.
Adding a sync/poolutil package with at least the worker use case.
sync/poolutil
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Overview
the
sync/pool
package is very verbose at the moment and operating it requires a lot of boilerplate code for task specific pools.It'd be best if we had some abstractions built on top which are purpose-specific rather than catering for all possible cases of a pool.
Possible Implementation
Adding a
sync/poolutil
package with at least the worker use case.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: