Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: correctly destroy spellcheck client #16525

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 29, 2019
Merged

fix: correctly destroy spellcheck client #16525

merged 2 commits into from Jan 29, 2019

Conversation

nitsakh
Copy link
Contributor

@nitsakh nitsakh commented Jan 24, 2019

Description of Change

Backport of #16448.

Checklist

Release Notes

Notes: Fixed memory leak caused by webFrame.setSpellCheckProvider.

@nitsakh nitsakh requested a review from a team January 24, 2019 07:02
@deepak1556
Copy link
Member

Can we re-run the ci build for electron-mas-testing, the test failure is a little concerning. Although this patch does pass on master.

@nitsakh any idea what might cause it to flake ?

@codebytere codebytere added backport This is a backport PR 5-0-x labels Jan 24, 2019
@codebytere codebytere changed the title Fix spell leak 5 0 fix: correctly destroy spellcheck client Jan 24, 2019
@nitsakh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nitsakh commented Jan 24, 2019

Not sure why that's failing. This change shouldn't have affected the spellcheck implementation.

@codebytere
Copy link
Member

@deepak1556 the failure passes on rerun, we should be good to go here!

@codebytere codebytere merged commit ae85864 into 5-0-x Jan 29, 2019
@release-clerk
Copy link

release-clerk bot commented Jan 30, 2019

Release Notes Persisted

Fixed memory leak caused by webFrame.setSpellCheckProvider.

@codebytere codebytere deleted the fix-spell-leak-5-0 branch January 30, 2019 00:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5-0-x backport This is a backport PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants