Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update: do not recommend require-atomic-updates (refs #11899) #12599

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2019

Conversation

kaicataldo
Copy link
Member

@kaicataldo kaicataldo commented Nov 25, 2019

refs #11899 (comment)

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[X] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
The TSC made a determination to remove require-atomic-updates from eslint:recommended, but it looks like we didn't end up making that change.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Nothing in particular.

@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the triage An ESLint team member will look at this issue soon label Nov 25, 2019
@kaicataldo kaicataldo force-pushed the fix-require-atomic-updates-recommended branch from 99e4dd8 to 3e4e439 Compare November 25, 2019 00:56
@kaicataldo kaicataldo changed the title Update: remove require-atomic-updates from eslint:recommended (refs #… Update: do not recommend require-atomic-updates (refs #11899) Nov 25, 2019
@kaicataldo kaicataldo added bug ESLint is working incorrectly enhancement This change enhances an existing feature of ESLint rule Relates to ESLint's core rules accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion and removed triage An ESLint team member will look at this issue soon labels Nov 25, 2019
jackodsteel added a commit to jackodsteel/cacophony-api that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2019
Also turned off a random check that got introduced that's due to be disabled as it's too noisy
(although maybe we consider fixing these if that's possible?)
eslint/eslint#12599
Also bumped the local eslint version as it's behind what gets installed by travis.
@kaicataldo kaicataldo merged commit 6e36d12 into master Dec 4, 2019
@kaicataldo kaicataldo deleted the fix-require-atomic-updates-recommended branch December 4, 2019 17:55
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 3, 2020
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Jun 3, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion bug ESLint is working incorrectly enhancement This change enhances an existing feature of ESLint rule Relates to ESLint's core rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants