Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update: check template literal in no-proto, no-iterator (fixes #12801) #12806

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 28, 2020
Merged

Update: check template literal in no-proto, no-iterator (fixes #12801) #12806

merged 3 commits into from Jan 28, 2020

Conversation

yeonjuan
Copy link
Member

Prerequisites checklist

  • I have read the contributing guidelines.
  • The team has reached consensus on the changes proposed in this pull request. If not, I understand that the evaluation process will begin with this pull request and won't be merged until the team has reached consensus.

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)

[ ] Documentation update
[x] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

For checking template literal, also, I change the checking logic to use getStaticPropertyName() in ast-utils.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

It needs a consensus of ESlint members. - #12801

@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the triage An ESLint team member will look at this issue soon label Jan 19, 2020
@yeonjuan yeonjuan changed the title Fix: check template literal key in no-proto, no-iterator Fix: check template literal key in no-proto, no-iterator (fixes #12801) Jan 19, 2020
@aladdin-add aladdin-add added accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion bug ESLint is working incorrectly rule Relates to ESLint's core rules and removed triage An ESLint team member will look at this issue soon labels Jan 19, 2020
@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic added the enhancement This change enhances an existing feature of ESLint label Jan 27, 2020
@mdjermanovic
Copy link
Member

I think it's reasonable to treat this as a bug fix because these rules already report foo["__proto__"] and foo["__iterator__"].

Only, the PR title should be Update: because this change generates more warnings.

Copy link
Member

@kaicataldo kaicataldo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed with @mdjermanovic that this should be a semver-minor bug fix and should be labeled as Update:. Otherwise, LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@yeonjuan yeonjuan changed the title Fix: check template literal key in no-proto, no-iterator (fixes #12801) Update: check template literal in no-proto, no-iterator (fixes #12801) Jan 28, 2020
@yeonjuan
Copy link
Member Author

@kaicataldo Sure, I changed the label, thanks!

@kaicataldo kaicataldo merged commit 03a69db into eslint:master Jan 28, 2020
@kaicataldo
Copy link
Member

Thanks for contributing!

@yeonjuan yeonjuan deleted the check-template-literal-in-no-proto-iterator branch January 29, 2020 13:50
montmanu pushed a commit to montmanu/eslint that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2020
…#12801) (eslint#12806)

* Fix: check template literal prop in no-proto (eslint#12801)

* Fix: check template literal prop in no-iterator (eslint#12801)

* add test cases
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 28, 2020
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Jul 28, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion bug ESLint is working incorrectly enhancement This change enhances an existing feature of ESLint rule Relates to ESLint's core rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants