New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update: check template literal in no-proto, no-iterator (fixes #12801) #12806
Update: check template literal in no-proto, no-iterator (fixes #12801) #12806
Conversation
I think it's reasonable to treat this as a bug fix because these rules already report Only, the PR title should be |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed with @mdjermanovic that this should be a semver-minor bug fix and should be labeled as Update:
. Otherwise, LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
@kaicataldo Sure, I changed the label, thanks! |
Thanks for contributing! |
…#12801) (eslint#12806) * Fix: check template literal prop in no-proto (eslint#12801) * Fix: check template literal prop in no-iterator (eslint#12801) * add test cases
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[ ] Documentation update
[x] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
For checking template literal, also, I change the checking logic to use
getStaticPropertyName()
inast-utils
.Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
It needs a consensus of ESlint members. - #12801