Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: add exponentiation operators to operator-assignment documentation #13577

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 19, 2020

Conversation

mdjermanovic
Copy link
Member

Prerequisites checklist

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)

[X] Documentation update

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Added ** and **= to the list of operators in operator-assignment rule docs, since the document explicitly lists all operators that are checked by this rule, except for these two.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic added rule Relates to ESLint's core rules documentation Relates to ESLint's documentation accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion labels Aug 17, 2020
@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic merged commit b487164 into master Aug 19, 2020
@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic deleted the operatorassignment-docsexp branch August 19, 2020 22:07
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 16, 2021
@eslint-deprecated eslint-deprecated bot added the archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion label Feb 16, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion archived due to age This issue has been archived; please open a new issue for any further discussion documentation Relates to ESLint's documentation rule Relates to ESLint's core rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants