New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update: add ignoreNonDeclaration to no-multi-assign rule (fixes #12545) #14185
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @t-mangoe, thanks for the PR!
Can you also update documentation for this rule?
@mdjermanovic |
@mdjermanovic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! The code looks good, I left only a minor suggestion, and a few comments about the documentation and the tests.
@mdjermanovic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the changes! I have just two minor suggestions, and then LGTM.
@mdjermanovic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
I'm not sure what's happening with the CLA check, will close/reopen to see if it will fix the check. |
All checks are green now. Thanks for contributing! |
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)
[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[x] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:
#12545
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
I added an option,
ignoreNonDeclaration
.This option ignores multi-assign when the variable is being declared.
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Nothing in particular.