Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project lacks process #3

Open
gnidan opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Project lacks process #3

gnidan opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@gnidan
Copy link
Member

gnidan commented Nov 15, 2022

How will work progress with this effort? How will we know if work is progressing?

Standards groups operate in projects with processes. These processes get documented. Sometimes a meeting schedule exists. This ethdebug project, in its infancy, has none of that yet.

Likely this will also need to include a list of responsible/consulted/etc. parties

@chaals
Copy link

chaals commented Nov 15, 2022

I suggest you aim for something like "rough consensus" as a decision-making process. The critical bit then is to work out who decides when there is rough consensus.

@gnidan gnidan added this to the 2022-12-02 Meeting milestone Nov 16, 2022
@chaals
Copy link

chaals commented Feb 22, 2023

Is the decision-making process for merging a PR documented somewhere? That seems important for anyone who wants to contribute but doesn't start out being part of the "in-crowd" ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants