Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How difficult would it be to create a similar package for libav? #121

Open
antoineMoPa opened this issue Apr 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@antoineMoPa
Copy link

Hi @eugeneware!

As you may know, ffmpeg is built of some libraries (libav*) - which can be useful on their own.

I'm currently manually managing libav dependencies in a node project (the project is using beamcoder) and I was wondering if packaging these libs as a node package would make sense.

Also, I wonder if this would this be a good fit for this project? Currently, it looks like ffmpeg-static ships a ffmpeg binary with all the libs already statically-linked. Maybe ffmpeg-static could ship a smaller ffmpeg executable with the libraries alongside - Probably the size would be similar, but we would gain the possibility of using beamcoder (and any other lib that might work with libav).

@derhuerst
Copy link
Collaborator

I have adapted the changes in #113 in the ffprobe branch (permalink). With these changes, we can publish any number of *-static "distribution packages" from this repo, as long as the download script can provide their binaries/files. We could definitely add another "distribution package" for libav libs (although the -static naming wouldn't make sense in this case)!

What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants