Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Provide a way to define types via expr #480

Open
antonmedv opened this issue Nov 27, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Provide a way to define types via expr #480

antonmedv opened this issue Nov 27, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
feature research

Comments

@antonmedv
Copy link
Member

Now expr inherits types from "example" env. I may be cool to have a API to define types explicitly.
@antonmedv antonmedv mentioned this issue May 7, 2024
Closed
@antonmedv
Copy link
Member Author

We can introduce those:

  • types.Map: for giving a hint of map fields.
  • types.StrictMap: field hints, plus only defined keys are allowed.

@staugaard
Copy link

This would be a great feature. Any plans of implementing this?

@antonmedv
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, this feature on the roadmap.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature research
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@staugaard @antonmedv