feat: SELinux support

[dylanmtaylor]

ls -Z and eza -Z have very different results produced

[cafkafk]

could you describe in more detail what the differences are and how this affects your usage?

[dylanmtaylor]

ls -Z:

eza -Z:

[cafkafk]

what does this look like with the -l flag? (I don't have a SELinux box to test on)

[dylanmtaylor]

ls -l

eza -l

You can test on a Fedora Live ISO which has SELinux by default.

[MartinFillon]

Hey, as per right now, -Z or security contextm is keeped behind two things, first the -l flag, and secondly xattr, they need to be enabled, they are currenty only supported on target oses:

• linux
• netbsd
• macos
• freebsd

if SELinux is a different os than those then this can be the reason why its not working. As I dont have the ability to run a SELinux os . Feel free to test and maybe debug the variable to see if its enabled in a rust basic project. code the ENABLED const is here the reason.

[dylanmtaylor]

Hey, as per right now, -Z or security contextm is keeped behind two things, first the -l flag, and secondly xattr, they need to be enabled, they are currenty only supported on target oses:

* `linux`

* `netbsd`

* `macos`

* `freebsd`

if SELinux is a different os than those then this can be the reason why its not working. As I dont have the ability to run a SELinux os . Feel free to test and maybe debug the variable to see if its enabled in a rust basic project. code the ENABLED const is here the reason.

SELinux is not a different OS than Linux.

[MartinFillon]

SELinux is not a different OS than Linux.

Ok then i think you not having the same output is due to us gatekeeping it behind -l