Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: migrate jest-matcher-util to TypeScript #7835

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 8, 2019

Conversation

SimenB
Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB commented Feb 8, 2019

Summary

Built diff

diff --git c/packages/jest-matcher-utils/build/index.js w/packages/jest-matcher-utils/build/index.js
index b143d3401..689257730 100644
--- c/packages/jest-matcher-utils/build/index.js
+++ w/packages/jest-matcher-utils/build/index.js
@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ function _interopRequireDefault(obj) {
  *
  * This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
  * LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
- *
- *
  */
 const _prettyFormat$plugins = _prettyFormat.default.plugins,
   AsymmetricMatcher = _prettyFormat$plugins.AsymmetricMatcher,

Test plan

Green CI

@SimenB SimenB merged commit 7906f1d into jestjs:master Feb 8, 2019
@SimenB SimenB deleted the ts-matcher-util branch February 8, 2019 10:08
captain-yossarian pushed a commit to captain-yossarian/jest that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2019
* chore: migrate jest-matcher-util to TypeScript

* link to PR

* unknown and fix flow
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 12, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants