Skip to content

Question: automations, locks with toolkit #220

Answered by squaremo
anarcher asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

There's an implementation and a design discussion -- #107.

The purpose of the controller is to do image update automation, but it works in a different way to Flux v1, because it follows the conventions of using custom resources and running individual controllers and so on. The implementation does the minimum, so far -- the design discussion is about a more capable and convenient design.

Replies: 1 comment 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@anarcher
Comment options

@squaremo
Comment options

Answer selected by anarcher
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants