Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make the 'versions' table name configurable. #20

Open
aadrian opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Make the 'versions' table name configurable. #20

aadrian opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@aadrian
Copy link
Member

aadrian commented Oct 30, 2020

Please make the 'versions' table name configurable, in order to avoid colissions with some other applications, or corporate policies.
@takezoe
Copy link
Member

takezoe commented Nov 3, 2020 •
edited

Basically, I don't recommend to share the gitbucket database with other applications. Not only versions but also any other tables can conflict. Regarding corporate policies, is only versions table problematic?

@takezoe
Copy link
Member

takezoe commented Nov 3, 2020

Ah, no. This is request for solidbase, not for GitBucket. Sorry, I was confusing.

Supporting a different version table name in solidbase makes sense!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@aadrian @takezoe