Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect Association of Predefined Tasks and Associated Elements During Ticket Creation (Issue Reopening) #16759

Open
2 tasks done
jussara-ti opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jussara-ti
Copy link

jussara-ti commented Mar 12, 2024

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Version

10.0.11

Bug description

Hello, I have found a bug in ticket creation.

On the ticket creation screen, if I mistakenly select a category [1] that has a predefined task and/or associated element, and then change it to the correct category [2], the ticket will be created in the last selected category [2] as expected.

However, if this category [2] does not have a predefined task and/or associated element, the ticket will be opened with the predefined task and/or associated element from the first selected category [1].

Relevant log output

No response

Page URL

No response

Steps To reproduce

  1. Create a ticket template [1] linked to a ITIL category that has a predefined task and/or associated element.
  2. Create a ticket template [2] linked to a ITIL category that does NOT have a predefined task and/or associated element.
  3. On the ticket creation screen, select the first category [1], wait for the page to reload, and then change it to the second category [2].
  4. Complete the ticket creation process.

Your GLPI setup information

Installation mode: TARBALL

Operating system: Linux GLPI 6.1.0-13-amd64 #​1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.55-1 (2023-09-29) x86_64
PHP 8.2.7 apache2handler (Core, FFI, PDO, Phar, Reflection, SPL, SimpleXML, Zend OPcache, apache2handler, apcu, bcmath, bz2,
calendar, ctype, curl, date, dom, exif, fileinfo, filter, ftp, gd, gettext, hash, iconv, igbinary, imagick, imap, intl, json,
ldap, libxml, mbstring, memcache, mysqli, mysqlnd, openssl, pcre, pdo_mysql, posix, random, readline, redis, session, shmop,
soap, sockets, sodium, standard, sysvmsg, sysvsem, sysvshm, tokenizer, xml, xmlreader, xmlrpc, xmlwriter, xsl, zip, zlib)
Setup: max_execution_time="30" memory_limit="512M" post_max_size="8M" safe_mode="" session.save_handler="files"
upload_max_filesize="2M"
disable_functions="pcntl_alarm,pcntl_fork,pcntl_waitpid,pcntl_wait,pcntl_wifexited,pcntl_wifstopped,pcntl_wifsignaled,pcntl_wifcontinued,pcntl_wexitstatus,pcntl_wtermsig,pcntl_wstopsig,pcntl_signal,pcntl_signal_get_handler,pcntl_signal_dispatch,pcntl_get_last_error,pcntl_strerror,pcntl_sigprocmask,pcntl_sigwaitinfo,pcntl_sigtimedwait,pcntl_exec,pcntl_getpriority,pcntl_setpriority,pcntl_async_signals,pcntl_unshare,"

Software: Apache/2.4.57 (Debian) (Apache/2.4.57 (Debian) Server at glpi.xxxxxx.com Port 443
)

Anything else?

The bug started in the version 10.0.5.
The previous issue got stale, so I reopened it.

Copy link
Contributor

There has been no activity on this issue for some time and therefore it is considered stale and will be closed automatically in 10 days.

If this issue is related to a bug, please try to reproduce on latest release. If the problem persist, feel free to add a comment to revive this issue.
If it is related to a new feature, please open a topic to discuss with community about this enhancement on suggestion website.

You may also consider taking a subscription to get professionnal support or contact GLPI editor team directly.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label May 12, 2024
@jussara-ti
Copy link
Author

The error still happening

@trasher trasher removed the Stale label May 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants