Address bar parameter splicing failed

[web-xiaxia]

版本 v2.6.1
方法 /transport/http/binding/encode.go:15

有人遇到过么 是bug还是我使用方式不正确
proto文件如下

[kratos-ci-bot]

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿

---

Version v2.6.1
Method /transport/http/binding/encode.go:15

Has anyone encountered it? Is it a bug or am I using it incorrectly?
The proto file is as follows

[dosubot]

Hi, @web-xiaxia! I'm Dosu, and I'm here to help the kratos team manage their backlog. I wanted to let you know that we are marking this issue as stale.

Based on my understanding, you opened the issue titled "Address bar parameter splicing failed" and asked if anyone has encountered the problem before and if it is a bug or incorrect usage. There hasn't been any further activity on this issue apart from a comment from kratos-ci-bot, which seems to be an automated translation of the issue body.

Before we proceed, we would like to confirm if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the kratos repository. If it is, please let us know by commenting on the issue. Otherwise, feel free to close the issue yourself, or the issue will be automatically closed in 7 days.

Thank you for your contribution, and we appreciate your understanding. If you have any further questions or need assistance, please don't hesitate to reach out.

[ruinshe]

This issue still affects our production code, there is a pending PR #2774 to fix.

This bug affects all under_score_path_variable APIs client side dispatching, and we pathed the PR #2774 for a quick fix before, do you consider review and merge it?

I wrote a demo code for a quick reproduce in latest Kratos version (v2.7.1), and when I rename the path variable user_id to id, it works.

[dosubot]

@kratos-ci-bot Could you please review and merge PR #2774? The issue reported by @ruinshe is still affecting their production code and they have provided a demo code for reproduction. Thank you for your assistance.

[dosubot]

Hi, @web-xiaxia,

I'm helping the Kratos team manage our backlog and am marking this issue as stale. From what I understand, the issue "Address bar parameter splicing failed" was reported by you in version v2.6.1, involving parameter splicing failure in the address bar. There has been recent activity from ruinshe, who mentioned a pending PR #2774 to fix the bug affecting production code and provided a demo for reproduction. I have requested a review and merge of the PR from kratos-ci-bot.

Could you please confirm if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Kratos repository? If it is, please let the Kratos team know by commenting on the issue. Otherwise, feel free to close the issue yourself, or it will be automatically closed in 7 days. Thank you!

[ruinshe]

any updates for this issue?

[web-xiaxia]

Hi, @web-xiaxia,

I'm helping the Kratos team manage our backlog and am marking this issue as stale. From what I understand, the issue "Address bar parameter splicing failed" was reported by you in version v2.6.1, involving parameter splicing failure in the address bar. There has been recent activity from ruinshe, who mentioned a pending PR #2774 to fix the bug affecting production code and provided a demo for reproduction. I have requested a review and merge of the PR from kratos-ci-bot.

Could you please confirm if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Kratos repository? If it is, please let the Kratos team know by commenting on the issue. Otherwise, feel free to close the issue yourself, or it will be automatically closed in 7 days. Thank you!

我试了下main分支 问题还是存在

[dosubot]

🤖

I understand that you're still experiencing the "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue even after the merge of PR #2774. To assist you further, I would need to understand the exact nature of the issue you're facing.

From the context provided, it seems like the parameter splicing in the address bar within the Kratos framework works by replacing placeholders in a URL template with values from a protobuf message. This is done in the EncodeURL function from the transport/http/binding/encode.go file.

If the issue is related to this function, it would be helpful to know the exact error message you're receiving and the conditions under which the error occurs. For example, does the error occur for all URL templates and protobuf messages, or only for specific ones?

Additionally, could you provide the steps you took to reproduce the issue after the merge of PR #2774? This would help in identifying whether the issue is with the PR itself or with the way it was tested.

Once I have this information, I can provide a more accurate solution to your problem. You can share this information by replying to this message or updating the original issue with the additional details.

For reference, here is the EncodeURL function in the Kratos repository.

Sources

• transport/http/binding/encode.go

About Dosu

This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.

Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant.

If you want to continue the conversation, start your reply with @dosu-bot.

[web-xiaxia]

🤖

据我了解，即使在合并 PR #2774后，您仍然遇到“地址栏参数拼接失败”问题。为了进一步帮助您，我需要了解您所面临问题的确切性质。

从提供的上下文来看，Kratos 框架中地址栏中的参数拼接似乎是通过用 protobuf 消息中的值替换 URL 模板中的占位符来工作的。这是在文件EncodeURL的函数中完成的transport/http/binding/encode.go。

如果问题与此功能相关，那么了解您收到的确切错误消息以及发生错误的条件会很有帮助。例如，错误是针对所有 URL 模板和 protobuf 消息发生的，还是仅针对特定的？

此外，您能否提供合并 PR #2774后重现问题所采取的步骤？这将有助于确定问题是与 PR 本身有关还是与测试方式有关。

一旦我掌握了这些信息，我就可以为您的问题提供更准确的解决方案。您可以通过回复此消息或使用其他详细信息更新原始问题来共享此信息。

作为参考，这里是Kratos 存储库中的EncodeURL 函数。

来源

• 运输/http/binding/encode.go

关于多苏

此回复旨在有用并节省您的时间。它并不是一个精确的解决方案，而是您自己研究的起点。

帮助我变得更有用！如果这有帮助，请留下 👍；如果不相关，请留下 👎。

如果您想继续对话，请以以下方式开始回复@dosu-bot。

🤖

据我了解，即使在合并 PR #2774后，您仍然遇到“地址栏参数拼接失败”问题。为了进一步帮助您，我需要了解您所面临问题的确切性质。

从提供的上下文来看，Kratos 框架中地址栏中的参数拼接似乎是通过用 protobuf 消息中的值替换 URL 模板中的占位符来工作的。这是在文件EncodeURL的函数中完成的transport/http/binding/encode.go。

如果问题与此功能相关，那么了解您收到的确切错误消息以及发生错误的条件会很有帮助。例如，错误是针对所有 URL 模板和 protobuf 消息发生的，还是仅针对特定的？

此外，您能否提供合并 PR #2774后重现问题所采取的步骤？这将有助于确定问题是与 PR 本身有关还是与测试方式有关。

一旦我掌握了这些信息，我就可以为您的问题提供更准确的解决方案。您可以通过回复此消息或使用其他详细信息更新原始问题来共享此信息。

作为参考，这里是Kratos 存储库中的EncodeURL 函数。

来源

• 运输/http/binding/encode.go

关于多苏

此回复旨在有用并节省您的时间。它并不是一个精确的解决方案，而是您自己研究的起点。

帮助我变得更有用！如果这有帮助，请留下 👍；如果不相关，请留下 👎。

如果您想继续对话，请以以下方式开始回复@dosu-bot。

🤖

据我了解，即使在 mcm PR #2774后，您仍然遇到“地址栏参数切割失败”问题。为了进一步帮助您，我需要了解您所面临的有意性质的问题。

从提供的上下文来看，Kratos 框架中地址栏的参数拼接似乎是通过用 protobuf 消息中的值替换 URL 模板中的占位符来工作的。这是在文件EncodeURL的函数中完成的transport/http/binding/encode.go。

如果问题与此功能相关，那么了解您收到的有意错误消息以及发生错误的情况还是很有帮助。例如，错误是针对所有 URL 模板和 protobuf 消息发生的，仅针对特定的？

另外，您能否提供合并 PR #2774后更换问题所采取的步骤？这将有助于确定问题是与 PR 本身有关还是与测试方式有关。

一旦我掌握了这些信息，我就可以为您的问题提供更准确的解决方案。您可以通过回复此消息或使用其他详细信息更新原始问题来分享此信息。

作为参考，这里是Kratos 存储库中的EncodeURL 函数。

来源

• 运输/http/binding/encode.go

关于多苏

此回复旨在有用并节省您的时间。它不是一个准确的解决方案，而是您自己研究的起点。

帮助我变得更有用！如果这有帮助，请留下👍；如果不相关，请留下👎。

如果您想继续对话，请以以下方式开始回复@dosu-bot。

#2774 就是修复这个问题的 修复后没有遇到 #2774中提到数组问题已由#2805解决了

[kratos-ci-bot]

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿

---

🤖

As I understand it, even after merging PR #2774, you still encounter the "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue. In order to help you further, I need to understand the exact nature of the problem you are facing.

From the context provided, it appears that parameter splicing in the address bar in the Kratos framework works by replacing placeholders in the URL template with values ​​from the protobuf message. This is done in the function EncodeURL in the file transport/http/binding/encode.go.

If the problem is related to this feature, it can be helpful to know the exact error message you received and the conditions under which it occurred. For example, does the error occur for all URL templates and protobuf messages, or just specific ones?

Additionally, can you provide the steps you took to reproduce the issue after merging PR #2774? This will help determine if the problem is with the PR itself or with the way it was tested.

Once I have this information, I can provide a more accurate solution to your problem. You can share this information by replying to this message or updating the original question with additional details.

For reference, here is the EncodeURL function from the Kratos repository.

Source

• transport/http/binding/encode.go

About Dosu

This reply is intended to be helpful and save you time. It's not intended to be an exact solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.

Help me become more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this was helpful and a 👎 if not.

If you would like to continue the conversation, please start replying to @dosu-bot as follows.

🤖

As I understand it, even after merging PR #2774, you still encounter the "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue. In order to help you further, I need to understand the exact nature of the problem you are facing.

From the context provided, it appears that parameter splicing in the address bar in the Kratos framework works by replacing placeholders in the URL template with values ​​from the protobuf message. This is done in the function EncodeURL in the file transport/http/binding/encode.go.

If the problem is related to this feature, it can be helpful to know the exact error message you received and the conditions under which it occurred. For example, does the error occur for all URL templates and protobuf messages, or just specific ones?

Additionally, can you provide the steps you took to reproduce the issue after merging PR #2774? This will help determine if the problem is with the PR itself or with the way it was tested.

Once I have this information, I can provide a more accurate solution to your problem. You can share this information by replying to this message or updating the original question with additional details.

For reference, here is the EncodeURL function from the Kratos repository.

Source

• transport/http/binding/encode.go

About Dosu

This reply is intended to be helpful and save you time. It's not intended to be an exact solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.

Help me become more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this was helpful and a 👎 if not.

If you would like to continue the conversation, please start replying to @dosu-bot as follows.

🤖

As far as I understand, even after mcm PR #2774, you still encounter the "address bar parameter cutting failed" issue. To help you further, I need to understand the intentional nature of the problem you are facing.

From the context provided, it appears that parameter splicing for the address bar in the Kratos framework works by replacing placeholders in the URL template with values ​​from the protobuf message. This is done in the function EncodeURL in the file transport/http/binding/encode.go.

If the problem is related to this feature, it can still be helpful to understand the intentional error messages you receive and the circumstances under which they occur. For example, the error occurs for all URL templates and protobuf messages, only for a specific?

Also, can you provide the steps you took to replace the issue after merging PR #2774? This will help determine if the problem is with the PR itself or with the way it was tested.

Once I have this information, I can provide a more accurate solution to your problem. You can share this information by replying to this message or updating the original question with additional details.

For reference, here is the EncodeURL function from the Kratos repository.

Source

• transport/http/binding/encode.go

About Dosu

This reply is intended to be helpful and save you time. It's not an exact solution, but a starting point for your own research.

Help me become more useful! If this is helpful, please leave it 👍; if it's not relevant, please leave it 👎.

If you would like to continue the conversation, please start replying to @dosu-bot as follows.

#2774 is to fix this problem. After the fix, I did not encounter the array problem mentioned in #2774, which has been solved by #2805.

[dosubot]

🤖

The "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue seems to be related to how URL parameters are encoded and decoded, particularly in the context of handling complex data structures and protobuf messages. The tests provided in form_test.go cover various scenarios, including encoding and decoding of simple data types, complex nested structures, protobuf messages with different field types (e.g., wrappers, timestamps, field masks), and handling of special cases like bytes values and optional fields.

To reproduce the issue after merging PR #2774, you should focus on the specific changes introduced by this PR and how they might affect the encoding and decoding processes. Given that PR #2774 was intended to fix a problem related to array handling, which was subsequently solved by #2805, it's crucial to verify if the issue persists with the latest changes. Here's a step-by-step guide to reproduce and investigate the issue:

1. Review PR 修复地址栏参数 #2774 and 修复地址栏参数有数组对象时无法正确拼接 #2805 Changes: Start by reviewing the changes made in these PRs. Understand what was modified or added in the encoding and decoding logic. Pay special attention to how arrays or slices are handled, as this was the focus of the fixes.

2. Identify Affected Scenarios: Based on the changes, identify which types of URL templates and protobuf messages might be affected. The issue could be specific to certain data structures or more general.

3. Write Test Cases: Using the form_test.go as a template, write additional test cases that cover the scenarios you identified as potentially affected. Ensure your tests cover a variety of data types and structures, including those specifically addressed in the PRs.

4. Run Tests: Execute your tests to see if the "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue occurs. Pay attention to any test failures or unexpected behavior.

5. Analyze Results: For any failed tests, analyze the output to determine if the issue is related to the changes made in PR 修复地址栏参数 #2774 or if it's a result of how the tests were conducted. It's possible that the issue could be due to incorrect test setup or expectations.

6. Isolate the Problem: If the issue is confirmed to be related to the PR changes, try to isolate the specific part of the code causing the problem. This might involve further testing with simplified scenarios or debugging the encoding/decoding logic step by step.

7. Verify Against the Original Issue: Finally, verify that the original array problem mentioned in 修复地址栏参数 #2774, which was solved by 修复地址栏参数有数组对象时无法正确拼接 #2805, does not reoccur. This ensures that any fix for the current issue does not reintroduce previous problems.

By following these steps, you should be able to determine if the "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue is specific to certain URL templates and protobuf messages or if it's a more general problem. Additionally, this approach will help you identify whether the issue is directly related to the changes made in PR #2774 or if it arises from how those changes were tested.

Unfortunately, I don't have the specific details of the changes made in PR #2774 and #2805. If you could provide more information about these changes, it would be helpful in further understanding the issue.

For reference, here is the form_test.go file in the Kratos repository.

Sources

• encoding/form/form_test.go

About Dosu

This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.

Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant.

If you want to continue the conversation, start your reply with @dosu-bot.

[web-xiaxia]

🤖

“地址栏参数拼接失败”问题似乎与 URL 参数的编码和解码方式有关，特别是在处理复杂数据结构和 protobuf 消息的情况下。提供的测试涵盖了form_test.go各种场景，包括简单数据类型、复杂嵌套结构、具有不同字段类型（例如包装器、时间戳、字段掩码）的 protobuf 消息的编码和解码，以及字节值和可选字段等特殊情况的处理。

要在合并 PR #2774后重现该问题，您应该重点关注此 PR 引入的具体更改以及它们可能如何影响编码和解码过程。鉴于 PR #2774旨在解决与数组处理相关的问题，该问题随后由#2805解决，因此验证最新更改后问题是否仍然存在至关重要。以下是重现和调查该问题的分步指南：

1. Review PR 修复地址栏参数 #2774 and 修复地址栏参数有数组对象时无法正确拼接 #2805 Changes: Start by reviewing the changes made in these PRs. Understand what was modified or added in the encoding and decoding logic. Pay special attention to how arrays or slices are handled, as this was the focus of the fixes.
2. 识别受影响的场景：根据更改，识别哪些类型的 URL 模板和 protobuf 消息可能会受到影响。该问题可能特定于某些数据结构或更普遍。
3. 编写测试用例：使用form_test.go作为模板，编写额外的测试用例，涵盖您确定为可能受影响的场景。确保您的测试涵盖各种数据类型和结构，包括 PR 中专门讨论的数据类型和结构。
4. 运行测试：执行测试以查看是否出现“地址栏参数拼接失败”问题。注意任何测试失败或意外行为。
5. 分析结果：对于任何失败的测试，分析输出以确定问题是否与 PR修复地址栏参数 #2774中所做的更改有关，或者是否是测试进行方式的结果。该问题可能是由于不正确的测试设置或期望造成的。
6. 隔离问题：如果确认问题与 PR 更改有关，请尝试隔离导致问题的代码的特定部分。这可能涉及使用简化场景进行进一步测试或逐步调试编码/解码逻辑。
7. Verify Against the Original Issue: Finally, verify that the original array problem mentioned in 修复地址栏参数 #2774, which was solved by 修复地址栏参数有数组对象时无法正确拼接 #2805, does not reoccur. This ensures that any fix for the current issue does not reintroduce previous problems.

通过执行这些步骤，您应该能够确定“地址栏参数拼接失败”问题是否特定于某些 URL 模板和 protobuf 消息，或者是否是一个更普遍的问题。此外，此方法将帮助您确定问题是否与 PR #2774中所做的更改直接相关，或者是否由这些更改的测试方式引起。

不幸的是，我没有 PR #2774和#2805中所做更改的具体细节。如果您能提供有关这些更改的更多信息，将有助于进一步了解该问题。

作为参考，这里是Kratos 存储库中的form_test.go文件。

来源

• 编码/form/form_test.go

关于多苏

transport/http/binding/encode.go

🤖

The "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue seems to be related to how URL parameters are encoded and decoded, particularly in the context of handling complex data structures and protobuf messages. The tests provided in form_test.go cover various scenarios, including encoding and decoding of simple data types, complex nested structures, protobuf messages with different field types (e.g., wrappers, timestamps, field masks), and handling of special cases like bytes values and optional fields.

To reproduce the issue after merging PR #2774, you should focus on the specific changes introduced by this PR and how they might affect the encoding and decoding processes. Given that PR #2774 was intended to fix a problem related to array handling, which was subsequently solved by #2805, it's crucial to verify if the issue persists with the latest changes. Here's a step-by-step guide to reproduce and investigate the issue:

1. Review PR 修复地址栏参数 #2774 and 修复地址栏参数有数组对象时无法正确拼接 #2805 Changes: Start by reviewing the changes made in these PRs. Understand what was modified or added in the encoding and decoding logic. Pay special attention to how arrays or slices are handled, as this was the focus of the fixes.
2. Identify Affected Scenarios: Based on the changes, identify which types of URL templates and protobuf messages might be affected. The issue could be specific to certain data structures or more general.
3. Write Test Cases: Using the form_test.go as a template, write additional test cases that cover the scenarios you identified as potentially affected. Ensure your tests cover a variety of data types and structures, including those specifically addressed in the PRs.
4. Run Tests: Execute your tests to see if the "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue occurs. Pay attention to any test failures or unexpected behavior.
5. Analyze Results: For any failed tests, analyze the output to determine if the issue is related to the changes made in PR 修复地址栏参数 #2774 or if it's a result of how the tests were conducted. It's possible that the issue could be due to incorrect test setup or expectations.
6. Isolate the Problem: If the issue is confirmed to be related to the PR changes, try to isolate the specific part of the code causing the problem. This might involve further testing with simplified scenarios or debugging the encoding/decoding logic step by step.
7. Verify Against the Original Issue: Finally, verify that the original array problem mentioned in 修复地址栏参数 #2774, which was solved by 修复地址栏参数有数组对象时无法正确拼接 #2805, does not reoccur. This ensures that any fix for the current issue does not reintroduce previous problems.

By following these steps, you should be able to determine if the "Address bar parameter splicing failed" issue is specific to certain URL templates and protobuf messages or if it's a more general problem. Additionally, this approach will help you identify whether the issue is directly related to the changes made in PR #2774 or if it arises from how those changes were tested.

Unfortunately, I don't have the specific details of the changes made in PR #2774 and #2805. If you could provide more information about these changes, it would be helpful in further understanding the issue.

For reference, here is the form_test.go file in the Kratos repository.

Sources

• encoding/form/form_test.go

About Dosu

测试用例已经提供了的>
/binding/encode_test.go

[dosubot]

🤖

Based on the error messages and behaviors you've observed, it seems like the issue might be related to how URL parameters are parsed and used in service discovery and endpoint resolution. However, without more specific information about the exact circumstances under which these errors occur, it's difficult to pinpoint the exact cause.

Regarding the changes made in PR #2774 and #2805, I'm unable to find specific details about these pull requests in the repository. If you could provide more information about the changes made in these PRs, it would be helpful in understanding their potential impact on the issue.

As for the test cases in form_test.go and /binding/encode_test.go, they seem to cover a wide range of scenarios, including handling of basic types, optional fields, complex nested structures, protobuf well-known types, and encoding/decoding of form data. If the issue persists despite these test cases passing, it suggests that the issue might be related to a scenario that isn't covered by these tests.

One way to narrow down the issue would be to isolate the specific URL templates and protobuf messages that are causing the problem. If the issue only occurs with certain templates or messages, it would suggest that the problem is specific to those cases. On the other hand, if the issue occurs with all templates and messages, it would suggest a more general problem.

Another approach would be to examine the changes made in PR #2774 and #2805 in more detail. If the issue started occurring after these changes were merged, it would suggest that the problem is directly related to these changes. If the issue was present before these changes were merged, it would suggest that the problem is not directly related to these changes, but might be related to how these changes were tested.

I hope this helps in troubleshooting the issue. If you have any more information or if there's anything else I can do to assist, please let me know.

Sources

• transport/http/resolver.go
• encoding/form/form_test.go

About Dosu

This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.

Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant.

If you want to continue the conversation, start your reply with @dosu-bot.

[web-xiaxia]

🤖

根据您观察到的错误消息和行为，问题似乎可能与服务发现和端点解析中如何解析和使用 URL 参数有关。但是，如果没有关于这些错误发生的意外情况的更具体信息，就很难查清楚切的原因。

关于 PR #2774和#2805中所做的更改，我无法在存储库中找到有关这些拉取请求的具体详细信息。如果您可以提供有关这些 PR 中所做的更改的更多信息，将有助于了解它们对问题的潜在影响。

form_test.go对于和中的测试示例/binding/encode_test.go，它们似乎涵盖了广泛的场景，包括处理基本类型、任选字段、复杂写入结构、protobuf 响亮的类型以及表单数据的编码/解码。尽管如果这些测试示例通过了问题仍然存在，则表明该问题可能与这些测试未涵盖的场景有关。

缩小问题范围的一种方法是隔离导致问题的特定 URL 模板和 protobuf 消息。如果问题仅出现在某些模板或消息中，则表明该问题特定于这些情况。或者，如果所有模板和消息都出现出现问题，则表明存在更普遍的问题。

另一种方法是更详细地检查 PR #2774和#2805 中所做的更改。如果问题在 合并这些更改后开始出现，则表明该问题与这些更改直接相关。如果问题在合并这些更改之前就存在，则表明该问题与这些更改没有直接关系，但可能与这些更改的测试方式有关。

我希望这有助于解决问题。如果您有更多信息或者我可以提供任何其他帮助，请告诉我。

来源

• 运输/http/resolver.go
• 编码/form/form_test.go

关于多苏

抱歉确实不明白您的意思，我在pr分支试了这个两个测试用例都是通过的

[kratos-ci-bot]

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿

---

🤖

Based on the error messages and behavior you observe, it appears that the issue may be related to how URL parameters are parsed and used in service discovery and endpoint resolution. However, without more specific information about the unexpected circumstances under which these errors occur, it can be difficult to pinpoint the exact cause.

Regarding the changes made in PR #2774 and #2805, I cannot find specific details about these pull requests in the repository information. If you could provide more information about the changes made in these PRs, it would help understand their potential impact on the issue.

form_test.go For the test examples in /binding/encode_test.go, they seem to cover a wide range of scenarios, including handling primitive types, optional fields, complex write structures, protobuf loud types, and form data encoding/decoding. Although if these test examples pass the problem still exists, it indicates that the problem may be related to a scenario not covered by these tests.

One way to narrow down the scope of the problem is to isolate the specific URL template and protobuf message that is causing the problem. If the problem occurs only in certain templates or messages, the problem is specific to those situations. Alternatively, if all templates and messages appear to be having problems, it could indicate a more general problem.

Another approach is to examine the changes made in PR #2774 and [#2805] in more detail. ](#2805) If the issue starts to appear after merging these changes, it means that the issue is directly related to these changes. If the problem exists before these changes are merged, it indicates that the problem is not directly related to these changes, but may be related to how these changes were tested.

I hope this helps solve the problem. Please let me know if you have more information or if I can be of any other assistance.

Source

• transport/http/resolver.go
• encoding/form/form_test.go

About Dosu

Sorry, I really don’t understand what you mean. I tried this on the pr branch and both test cases passed.