Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: generating webpackable packages #1547

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Jan 18, 2019
Merged

Conversation

alexander-fenster
Copy link
Member

@alexander-fenster alexander-fenster commented Jan 15, 2019

Generating small packages that are:

  • webpackable
  • usable (AuthPlus is re-exported from googleapis-common to make it available for users).

@alexander-fenster alexander-fenster added the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Jan 15, 2019
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jan 15, 2019
@alexander-fenster alexander-fenster removed the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Jan 18, 2019
@alexander-fenster alexander-fenster changed the title DO NOT MERGE: feat: generating webpackable packages feat: generating webpackable packages Jan 18, 2019
@alexander-fenster
Copy link
Member Author

@JustinBeckwith This is now ready for review!

Copy link
Contributor

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM w/nits. Have you run the generator to make sure the resulting output looks right? From a process perspective:

  1. Please run the generator against master, and submit a PR with any changes
  2. After that lands, let's land this PR
  3. Let's follow up with a PR that includes just the generated changes from this PR

src/generator/templates/package.json.njk Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alexander-fenster
Copy link
Member Author

This complicated process is exactly the reason why I suggest that generator should live outside of this library, being a devDependency :)

#1554 shows the changes to all APIs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants