Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation #20

Closed
wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 13 comments
Closed

OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation #20

wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor

From yan...@google.com on December 09, 2011 12:34:53

External references, such as a standards document, or specification? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation Java environments (e.g. Java 6, Android 2.3, App Engine, or All)? All Please describe the feature requested. Implement the specification for OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation. Example HTTP request:

    POST /revoke HTTP/1.1
    Host: server.example.com
    Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
    Authorization: Basic czZCaGRSa3F0MzpnWDFmQmF0M2JW

    token=45ghiukldjahdnhzdauz&

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-oauth-java-client/issues/detail?id=20

@wonderfly wonderfly added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. imported priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. labels Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on February 28, 2012 17:04:10

Labels: -Priority-High -Milestone-Version1.7.0 Priority-Medium Milestone-Version1.8.0

@wonderfly wonderfly self-assigned this Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on March 27, 2012 07:11:53

Owner: rmis...@google.com
Cc: -rmis...@google.com
Labels: -Milestone-Version1.8.0 Milestone-Version1.9.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From rmis...@google.com on May 14, 2012 07:16:22

Labels: -Milestone-Version1.9.0 Milestone-Version1.10.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on May 30, 2012 09:20:17

Labels: -Milestone-Version1.10.0 Milestone-Version1.11.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on July 26, 2012 07:35:41

One use case: ability to revoke a refresh token if it has been stolen.

Labels: -Milestone-Version1.11.0 Milestone-Version1.12.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on September 26, 2012 05:19:08

Owner: yan...@google.com
Cc: rmis...@google.com
Labels: -Milestone-Version1.12.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on January 24, 2013 06:33:08

Owner: ngmic...@google.com
Labels: Milestone-Version2.1.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on February 06, 2013 16:05:32

Labels: -Milestone-Version2.1.0 Milestone-Version1.16.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on June 10, 2013 06:18:43

Owner: pele...@google.com
Cc: -rmis...@google.com ngmic...@google.com
Labels: -Milestone-Version1.16.0 Milestone-Version1.17.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on July 26, 2013 03:14:29

Labels: -Milestone-Version1.17.0

@wonderfly wonderfly removed their assignment May 20, 2016
@mattwhisenhunt mattwhisenhunt removed the priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. label Jan 8, 2018
@GuiSim
Copy link

GuiSim commented Feb 19, 2019

Why was this closed :( There's still no clean way to revoke a token using the Google Java SDK

@JustinBeckwith
Copy link
Contributor

Greetings! Would you mind opening up a new feature request? A lot of these bugs were so old we couldn't even tell where they came from or if they were still a problem.

@GuiSim
Copy link

GuiSim commented Feb 19, 2019

@JustinBeckwith Okay! I'll do that 👇
#250

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith self-assigned this Feb 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants