Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use javax.annotation.Nonnull in executor framework #2414

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 5, 2023

Conversation

rajatbhatta
Copy link
Contributor

Remove an additional dependency on org.jetbrains.annotations and use javax.annotation.Nonnull.

Remove an additional dependency on org.jetbrains.annotations and use javax.annotation.Nonnull.
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: xs Pull request size is extra small. api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. labels May 5, 2023
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. and removed size: xs Pull request size is extra small. labels May 5, 2023
@rajatbhatta rajatbhatta marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2023 11:57
@rajatbhatta rajatbhatta requested review from a team as code owners May 5, 2023 11:57
@rajatbhatta rajatbhatta added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 5, 2023
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label May 5, 2023
@rajatbhatta rajatbhatta merged commit afcc598 into main May 5, 2023
22 of 23 checks passed
@rajatbhatta rajatbhatta deleted the move-to-javax-nonnull branch May 5, 2023 12:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. size: s Pull request size is small.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants