Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing exclude rule merging optimizations #22358

Closed
ljacomet opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Missing exclude rule merging optimizations #22358

ljacomet opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ljacomet
Copy link
Member

From larger builds, we have found missed exclude rule merging optimizations. They need to be added.

@ljacomet ljacomet added this to the 6.9.3 milestone Oct 11, 2022
@ljacomet ljacomet self-assigned this Oct 11, 2022
ljacomet added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2022
Changes are based on real world use cases where keeping an allOf(group(s),module(s))
instead of making it a moduleId(Set) had pretty bad downstream consequences.

Fixes #22358
ljacomet added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2022
Changes are based on real world use cases where keeping an allOf(group(s),module(s))
instead of making it a moduleId(Set) had pretty bad downstream consequences.

Fixes #22358
@ljacomet
Copy link
Member Author

Changes merged

@ljacomet ljacomet added in:dependency-resolution engine metadata and removed to-triage labels Jan 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant