Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Result JSON: SQL without RWI list #9593

Open
lenok2018 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Result JSON: SQL without RWI list #9593

lenok2018 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@lenok2018
Copy link

lenok2018 commented Mar 8, 2024

Hello team.
Our team faces an unpleasant experience, using "expect_column_values_to_not_be_null" check with Prod data.
Prod DB tables contain a lot of null values now, so running GE test suits we obtain result JSON with thousands RWI in section Result format--> unexpected_list with COMPLETE setting.
We know that its an expected behavior of Complete setting, but this affects out result json significantly.
So, we are asking for new feature to provide the SQL without all this unexpected list rows.
Maybe it could be an additional Keyword argument, which can switch off Unexpected list specification or some other decision.

Please, review the example of our json file - there are more than 40000 RWI in unexpected list:

image

@austiezr
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @lenok2018 ! Thanks for raising this feature request -- we've captured this feedback for our internal backlog. I've leave this issue open for the next week if you have any additional context you'd like to provide. 🙇

@kujaska
Copy link

kujaska commented May 17, 2024

+100500 we need this tooooooooooooooo!

@0lgaZv
Copy link

0lgaZv commented May 17, 2024

Please resolve it!

@vasilijyaromenka
Copy link

vasilijyaromenka commented May 17, 2024

Please fix it as soon as you can. It causes issues for our team as well ((
this list might be converted to a set

@unkind58
Copy link

Will be brilliant to have some kind of a toggle for Unexpected list

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants