Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

能给作者Finder API 提供 单个作者的 文章访问量、点赞量、评论量? #5898

Open
chengzhongxue opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
area/core Issues or PRs related to the Halo Core kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done.

Comments

@chengzhongxue
Copy link

你当前使用的版本

2.15.2

描述一下此特性

image

附加信息

No response

@chengzhongxue
Copy link
Author

image
能提供文章归档 每月或者每年的文章访问量、点赞量、评论量

@ruibaby
Copy link
Member

ruibaby commented May 13, 2024

能提供文章归档 每月或者每年的文章访问量、点赞量、评论量

这个能通过 Thymeleaf 语法实现吗?根据单个文章的数据累加。

@ruibaby
Copy link
Member

ruibaby commented May 13, 2024

单个作者的 文章访问量、点赞量、评论量

可以考虑添加,但可能就不是单纯的 visit、upvote、comment 了,可能得定义为收到的访问量、点赞量、评论量,否则会让人以为这是单个用户访问文章时产生的数据。

@ruibaby ruibaby added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. area/core Issues or PRs related to the Halo Core priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. labels May 13, 2024
@chengzhongxue
Copy link
Author

能提供文章归档 每月或者每年的文章访问量、点赞量、评论量

这个能通过 Thymeleaf 语法实现吗?根据单个文章的数据累加。

好像不太行

@chengzhongxue
Copy link
Author

单个作者的 文章访问量、点赞量、评论量

可以考虑添加,但可能就不是单纯的 visit、upvote、comment 了,可能得定义为收到的访问量、点赞量、评论量,否则会让人以为这是单个用户访问文章时产生的数据。

对就是这样的

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/core Issues or PRs related to the Halo Core kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants