Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

FR: Matching maps with various type #388

Open
jarl-dk opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

FR: Matching maps with various type #388

jarl-dk opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@jarl-dk
Copy link

jarl-dk commented May 19, 2022

Given an actual map like this:

        Map actual = Map.of(
                "k1", Map.of(
                        "k11", "v11",
                        "k12", "v12"),
                "k2", List.of("v21", "v22"),
                "k3", "V3"
        );

I wish/expect to make an assertion with matcher that looks like this:

        assertThat(actual, AllOf.allOf(
                IsMapContaining.hasEntry("k1", AllOf.allOf(
                        IsMapContaining.hasEntry("k11", "v11"),
                        IsMapContaining.hasEntry("k12", "v12"))
                ),
                IsMapContaining.hasEntry("k2", IsIterableContainingInOrder.contains("v21","v22")),
                IsMapContaining.hasEntry("k3", "v3")
                )
        );```

But this fails with

java: no suitable method found for allOf(org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends java.lang.String>>>>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.lang.Iterable<? extends java.lang.String>>>>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends java.lang.String>>)
method org.hamcrest.core.AllOf.allOf(java.lang.Iterable<org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>>) is not applicable
(cannot infer type-variable(s) T
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length))
method org.hamcrest.core.AllOf.allOf(org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>...) is not applicable
(inferred type does not conform to upper bound(s)
inferred: java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends java.lang.String>
upper bound(s): java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends java.lang.String>,java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.lang.Iterable<? extends java.lang.String>>>,java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends java.lang.String>>>,java.lang.Object)
method org.hamcrest.core.AllOf.allOf(org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>) is not applicable
(cannot infer type-variable(s) T
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length))
method org.hamcrest.core.AllOf.allOf(org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>) is not applicable
(inferred type does not conform to upper bound(s)
inferred: java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends java.lang.String>
upper bound(s): java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends java.lang.String>,java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.lang.Iterable<? extends java.lang.String>>>,java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.util.Map<? extends java.lang.String,? extends java.lang.String>>>,java.lang.Object)
method org.hamcrest.core.AllOf.allOf(org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>) is not applicable
(cannot infer type-variable(s) T
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length))
method org.hamcrest.core.AllOf.allOf(org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>) is not applicable
(cannot infer type-variable(s) T
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length))
method org.hamcrest.core.AllOf.allOf(org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>,org.hamcrest.Matcher<? super T>) is not applicable
(cannot infer type-variable(s) T
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length))
@jarl-dk
Copy link
Author

jarl-dk commented May 19, 2022

I thnk this is related to

@dmfs dmfs mentioned this issue Dec 27, 2023
Closed
dmfs added a commit to saynotobugsorg/confidence that referenced this issue Dec 28, 2023
@dmfs
unsafeInstanceOf Quality, closes #155
714beb4 
This provides a Quality similar to `istanceOf` but also taking
`Quality`s of subclasses of the given class. This is unsafe because
there is no guarantee that the testee is actually of that subtype, but
it may be required if the testee is a generic class.

It solves issues like described in
hamcrest/JavaHamcrest#388
@dmfs dmfs mentioned this issue Dec 28, 2023
Merged
dmfs added a commit to saynotobugsorg/confidence that referenced this issue Dec 28, 2023
@dmfs
unsafeInstanceOf Quality, closes #155
26050c4 
This provides a Quality similar to `istanceOf` but also taking
`Quality`s of subclasses of the given class. This is unsafe because
there is no guarantee that the testee is actually of that subtype, but
it may be required if the testee is a generic class.

It solves issues like described in
hamcrest/JavaHamcrest#388
dmfs added a commit to saynotobugsorg/confidence that referenced this issue Dec 28, 2023
@dmfs
unsafeInstanceOf Quality, closes #155
f6da1cc 
This provides a Quality similar to `istanceOf` but also taking
`Quality`s of subclasses of the given class. This is unsafe because
there is no guarantee that the testee is actually of that subtype, but
it may be required if the testee is a generic class.

It solves issues like described in
hamcrest/JavaHamcrest#388
dmfs added a commit to saynotobugsorg/confidence that referenced this issue Dec 28, 2023
@dmfs
unsafeInstanceOf Quality, closes #155 (#156)
15c8981 
This provides a Quality similar to `instanceOf` but also taking
`Quality`s of subclasses of the given class. This is unsafe because
there is no guarantee that the testee is actually of that subtype, but
it may be required if the testee is a generic class.

It solves issues like described in
hamcrest/JavaHamcrest#388
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jarl-dk