azurerm_api_management_api lacks ability to set "Subscription required" flag to false

[SoftwareDreamer]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Terraform (and AzureRM Provider) Version

1.30

Affected Resource(s)

• azurerm_api_management_api

resource "azurerm_api_management_api" "example" {
  depends_on          = ["azurerm_api_management.mgmttest"]
  name                = "example-api"
  resource_group_name = "${azurerm_resource_group.rg.name}"
  api_management_name = "${azurerm_api_management.mgmttest.name}"
  revision            = "1"
  display_name        = "Example API"
  path                = "example"
  protocols           = ["https"]
  service_url         = "https://some_url"

Expected Behavior

By default the Subscription required flag should be set to false if no subscription_key_parameter_names are provided or there should be an argument subscription_required exposed for this flag. Right now it seems impossible to create an API Management Api without a required subscription (thus allowing simple passthrough/proxy scenarios).

Actual Behavior

Creating an API management always sets the Subscription required flag in the portal to true

Steps to Reproduce

Create any azurerm_api_management with any azurerm_api_management_api.

1. terraform apply

Important Factoids

none

References

https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/azurerm/r/api_management_api.html#subscription_key_parameter_names
shows no represenation for the flag

• #0000

[aczelandi]

hi @tombuildsstuff , is there any plan on implementing this? As @hkochniss pointed out it seems impossible to create an API endpoint without a subscription key.

[jackbatzner]

This actually referenced in PR 4885, please see my comments for why this can't be implemented just yet.

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!