Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UI to select multiple data points for an audited emissions certificate #637

Open
sichen1234 opened this issue Oct 24, 2022 · 4 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@sichen1234
Copy link
Contributor

Based on today's call I think it would be helpful to have a UI where the operator could request an audit by checking off many different data points, for example satellite upper, lower bounds, company reported figures, etc. for many different fields.

Right now the UI will allow you to choose "Other" as your activity type. Then it won't calculate the total emissions for you. It will just include the documentation. The auditor would then calculate the emissions based on the documentation you upload and issue the token.

@brioux
Copy link
Member

brioux commented Oct 25, 2022

This makes sense. the proposed request mechanism sends multiple data points to be interpreted by the auditor to issue a single token.

@brioux
Copy link
Member

brioux commented Oct 25, 2022

For a new carbon tracker contract the request is sent with the requested CarbonTracker ID set to 0. multiple data points can be relayed to the auditor to assess what tokens should be assigned to the tracker, e.g., methane flaring, venting, ...

The assigned auditor can use different calculators, including leveraging the supply-chain utility for converting industrial emissions into kg CO2e.

@sichen1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure. The code does not have to calculate the final emissions in this case, just forward all the data points for the auditor to perform the calculation.

@brioux
Copy link
Member

brioux commented Oct 28, 2022

@sichen1234 This issue is addressed initially in PR 642.

The test-typescript-app is failing but i explain why in the comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants