Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need more rust #1030

Open
Aeolun opened this issue Sep 6, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Need more rust #1030

Aeolun opened this issue Sep 6, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Aeolun
Copy link

Aeolun commented Sep 6, 2021

I don’t see Rust represented anywhere in this repositories languages. There should be at least one component that uses it, but much better would be if we rewrite all the already functional parts in Rust.

It’s faster.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 1, 2021

no nemerle, c# or vb.net either!!!!!! 😡😡😠👿🤬🤬🤬🤬

@chuigda
Copy link
Contributor

chuigda commented Dec 1, 2021

Technically, Rust does not function good as some functional language. Lacking TCO and unlimited extent making it awkward to use certain functional tricks. But I think I will give it a try.

@rilysh
Copy link

rilysh commented Jun 24, 2022

No, Rust ain't fast, at least not really from C/C++. It's like juice with LLVM backend, and where Rust compiler takes decades to compile a single program. I hate that how funking slow Rust compiler is. I don't need memory safety, and that should be in my control what I can do with memory, I don't need their "safe" code, as unsafe exist.

There's only one benefit is Rust compiler and LLVM does a great job, though still, they all do static linking which makes output binary size larger.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants