Switch case with ranges

[sparkforreg]

Is it a bug that case with a range is not translated correctly?

here is a c code example

switch(5) {
case 3 … 7 : print(“1”);
default: print(“2”);
}

[fw-immunant]

This isn't a bug per se, but a reasonable enhancement request--we don't yet support this nonstandard extension to C.

I hadn't realized this extension existed, but it seems widely supported (by GCC, Clang, and Sun's compilers at least) so it might be worth handling. Doing so would involve checking caseStmtIsGNURange when processing the Clang AST and probably rejiggering our CStmtKind enum a bit to be able to carry the information needed for range case statements.

[sparkforreg]

thanks for checking