Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confusing cluster launch behavior for failed instances #324

Open
hustonhoburg opened this issue Dec 3, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Confusing cluster launch behavior for failed instances #324

hustonhoburg opened this issue Dec 3, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@hustonhoburg
Copy link
Contributor

I launched a cluster where some of the instances return this error:

 InsufficientInstanceCapacity => We currently do not have sufficient 
 m3.xlarge capacity in the Availability Zone you requested (us-east-1d). 
 Our system will be working on provisioning additional capacity. 
 You can currently get m3.xlarge capacity by not specifying 
 an Availability Zone in your request or choosing us-east-1a, us-east-1b.

The launch continues for the provisioned machines, but fails to launch those that threw that error. This seems like a case of "undefined behavior". The end result isn't completely unexpected given the logged errors. However, my expectation was that if I launch a cluster, then the entire cluster will fail or succeed. My expectation wasn't partial success. It seems to me like maybe the entire launch should fail and revert if some of the machines fail to launch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant